[Public politics]United for Congress!

As a result of a courageous ATO operation, we ended up with a good part of the BAF in different parties in different regions. A hit list was distilled of candidates that are not part of our community - they could very well have hostile intentions with our country. We know who they are but since 100% certainty will only be given by admins, we cannot publish their names now. If you're in doubt on who to vote, please ask for advice.

That's why we recommend to vote on any party, for a candidate you know well and trust to be a Belgian in heart and soul.

it will better to make a g.doc for votes, why? Because someone will have more votes, we must make a balance.

As always, here's the BfB Voting Doc
www.tinyurl.com/belvote

BfB - Always Prepared! JOIN US!

Hum... what do we do then... give vote instructions for BfB AND BAF?

Olv007 wrote:Hum... what do we do then... give vote instructions for BfB AND BAF?

Muahahahaha. We have the army at our expense!!!!

I looked at the BfB list of supported candidates. About a fourth are not even active on the forum and yet you consider them high priority.

Do what is best for Belgium, vote for active members of UBIP, ULA, RB or BDF.

Chris Stanwick wrote:I looked at the BfB list of supported candidates. About a fourth are not even active on the forum and yet you consider them high priority.

Do what is best for Belgium, vote for active members of UBIP, ULA, RB or BDF.

I didn't put any priority right now because I still don't know how everything was arranged. I have only put that PTO'r as "sacrified"

Chris Stanwick wrote:I looked at the BfB list of supported candidates. About a fourth are not even active on the forum and yet you consider them high priority.

Do what is best for Belgium, vote for active members of UBIP, ULA, RB or BDF.

You mean ULA that joined BfB for some reason?

Glenn Wauters wrote:

Chris Stanwick wrote:I looked at the BfB list of supported candidates. About a fourth are not even active on the forum and yet you consider them high priority.

Do what is best for Belgium, vote for active members of UBIP, ULA, RB or BDF.

You mean ULA that joined BfB for some reason?

No? Basically, I mean vote for the active members of the Belgian community. The ones that frequent the forum and participate in national discussions. Not the ones that we have never seen here.

Chris Stanwick wrote:No? Basically, I mean vote for the active members of the Belgian community. The ones that frequent the forum and participate in national discussions. Not the ones that we have never seen here.

^ That.

The political differences are small in this eNation (/eWorld) so only active members can be usefull.

@Glenn: yes, some ULAmembers (and RB I think) moved to another party in an attempt to avoid a possible PTO'er to be elected. That kind of went wrong, I'm afraid.

@ Chris,

those priorities will be changed later on. They are all green for now. They will change once elections start.

I agree. Every PP should make a common list of supported candidates. Being in a party or an other isn't really important for the current eBelgium.

Glenn Wauters wrote:

Chris Stanwick wrote:I looked at the BfB list of supported candidates. About a fourth are not even active on the forum and yet you consider them high priority.

Do what is best for Belgium, vote for active members of UBIP, ULA, RB or BDF.

You mean ULA that joined BfB for some reason?

Big part of ULA joined BfB in Flanders on request of ThomasRed to prevent eWorldCitizen from actually ending up on the voting list. Unfortunaly he switched regions...

There will be a common voting list for the congress elections. Let's all work together to give those PTO'rs no chance !

Of the UBIP candidates, the only one we do not know is timloughner. Everyone else checks out.

Chris Stanwick wrote:Of the UBIP candidates, the only one we do not know is timloughner. Everyone else checks out.

As you can see in the voting orders sheet this was respected.

Olv007 wrote:

Chris Stanwick wrote:Of the UBIP candidates, the only one we do not know is timloughner. Everyone else checks out.

As you can see in the voting orders sheet this was respected.

Yes, I have perused the ato list extensively. I will be on IRC intermittently today to help organize if need be.