Combat Orders vs. Rep. of Moldova

by **e Vladimir** 2014-02-28, 12:56

The AS of Moldova is going very bad for us. Although we have 4 MPP's now, they clearly have more and stronger MPP's.
This maybe comes too little too late, but there is almost 40kcc or 39,153cc to be precise in the BNA MU for Combat Orders. Should we try and do something with these funds, or save it for later?

by **Mr. Wonka** 2014-02-28, 13:17

If we did use combat orders it would not be in the battle of Wallonia, we would wait for a new battle.

by **Fhaemita Malodorous** 2014-02-28, 13:51

Might be better to wait till for the RW, and use the money for RW's

by **e Vladimir** 2014-02-28, 15:03

by **Jofroi** 2014-03-01, 11:17

You know that paying for a rw when there is a direct campaign still going on is utterly stupid, right?

by **Fhaemita Malodorous** 2014-03-01, 11:23

Jofroi wrote:You know that paying for a rw when there is a direct campaign still going on is utterly stupid, right?

It isn't actually, there currently is a (direct) battle going on for Flanders that they are winning. If they have won that we'll be wiped and the war will end. The direct battle will end long before the RW so we're save. If we RW succeeds they will have to NE us again if they want attack that region. I actually know what I was doing Wink

by Sponsored content

Combat Orders vs. Rep. of Moldova

Combat Orders vs. Rep. of Moldova

Re: Combat Orders vs. Rep. of Moldova

Re: Combat Orders vs. Rep. of Moldova

Re: Combat Orders vs. Rep. of Moldova

Re: Combat Orders vs. Rep. of Moldova

Re: Combat Orders vs. Rep. of Moldova

Re: Combat Orders vs. Rep. of Moldova