New alliance: Luna

Oboacer wrote:A quick update on this really small alliance, bothAustria and Uruguay have recently joined the alliance. I guess it really is starting to attract those small nations that want to find allies.

Any particular reason why a small nation like eBelgium hasn't joined? I mean it could give your nation new training wars and it isn't caught up with the big alliances.

Thoughts?

Because, and forgive my rudeness, no matter how many small countries you add, it will always remain small, s*** and weak - compared to/in the eyes of - other alliances.

I see it this way: You can put 1 midget and 1 profighter in the ring and the pro-fighter wins. You can put 15 midget and 1 profighter in the ring and the profighter will still win. The only way for the midgets to win is if you throw enough midgets in for him to beat, till he's tired and gives up, but that would imply that 50 midgets get severely beaten up first. And even then you still haven't beaten him. At it's most you've came to a tie.

Luna is an alliance with 6 or 7 midgets.

Luna is no different than Sol, or any of the other fail alliances that spring up every few months.
The member nations alone show that this alliance has no promise.
Every single one of those nations is tiny, and weak. Hell some of them are barely even in control of their country, and are under PTO threat.

Bottom line, without atleast 1 major nation, the alliance fails.

Balkan wrote:
Bottom line, without atleast 1 major nation, the alliance fails.

jup

p much that

Balkan wrote:

Bottom line, without atleast 1 major nation, the alliance fails.

Right

an alliance with minor nations can't win against a major nation !
the alliance will fail !!

Wrong ^^. An alliance with minor nations can defeat a major nation. But they can't win as an alliance.

in this case the alliance must have many minor mations against one major nation, and a major nation without allies, it's uncommon, isn't it ? ^^

Fhaemita Malodorous wrote:
LUna seems like a loss cause just like all those other small defensive alliances with only small countries. They all failed

What about ABC?

They're backed up by ONE. I admit that's a success .

Yeah ABC is really cool,

ABC ? what's it ?

Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia (Lettonie).

and this alliance is a success ?!?

Yeah, they almost erased russia from the map (or did they succeeded?)

They succeeded !

cool !

you must see the little alliances (and sure their friends) maybe big countries from another alliance, that makes the difference.

Why some alliances failed? Because they were really alone.
You can look about our past, some countries (Ireland, Venezuela...) came to help us... but we are not in their alliance.

All countries have some best relations with others, no need to be in an alliance.

no need alliance if we have good relation with other nation, it's that ?

bilbo10 wrote:no need alliance if we have good relation with other nation, it's that ?

for me i prefer to have a lot of good relations in the eworld like to be in an alliance and to be in the obligation to follow orders from big countries.

Now, the discussion is for the others ebelgian's

i completely agree with you !! i hate obligations !

I think remaining on good terms is key. We in eNZ are not formally part of ONE but we have strong ties with them and other nations (Iran, Slovenia, Indonesia) that are also not part of the alliance but affiliated with it.

We also work to create better ties with countries in EDEN and Terra to ensure to they may not attack us. Alliances can be good but as noted, obligations led to tension.

Look at Terra right now, Argentina is threatening to pull out because it doesn't feel it gets any value for membership and is obliged to aid its partners in wars it doesn't deem in its nation interests.