constitution

i'm not a congressmember, so i post this here

I just saw at the congress-section that people are complaining again that the NE vote wasn't/isn't constitutional

the constitution says that there has to be a 24h debate before a proposal can put into a legal vote.

to avoid more problems with this rule, i have a little suggestion about the constitution:

when a vote is not the outcome of a previous 24h during debate, every single congressmember has a veto and thus the right to cancel the vote and start a new debate.
that implies that a vote without 24h debate is still constitutional, but that anyone who want's a debate, can ask one.

not neccessairy

If I hadnt complained it would have passed, so in fact I already used my veto

but when you adapt it, the vote is constitutional

i think that some complain about the fact that the vote is unconstitutional, and not about the fact that there wasn't a debate.

and they are right, we have a constitution, we should always follow it.

The current constitution is messed up. Everyone thinks its already good despite its obvious flaws which I pointed out here:
http://www.erepbelgium.com/t3243-concerns-about-the-constitution?highlight=concerns

Good luck convincing the bigots to change it!

I propose a law based on jurisprudence with no constitution :p.

Polygamy needs to be added to the constitution.

The constitution needs removed, and easier, single laws brought in to replace it like most countries have

temujin94 wrote:The constitution needs removed, and easier, single laws brought in to replace it like most countries have

+1 !!!!!

Critically wrote:

temujin94 wrote:The constitution needs removed, and easier, single laws brought in to replace it like most countries have

+1 !!!!!

If eBe wanted to go down this path, get a working MoJ with a team around him to replace the most important laws, then these seperate laws can be edited a lot more easier without having to changed every single detail on the constitution until it suits everyone

Critically wrote:

temujin94 wrote:The constitution needs removed, and easier, single laws brought in to replace it like most countries have

+1 !!!!!

+2 that is something that me or crit can bring in for august

temujin94 wrote:The constitution needs removed, and easier, single laws brought in to replace it like most countries have

No that would make too much sense, we can't have that

I was very disappointed to see that there was no MoJ appointed the last two months. We definitely still need one.

Constitutions suck!

Theneka wrote:Constitutions suck!

Nah
Nose nitpickers who want to do follow the constitution by the letter sucks

Fhaemita Malodorous wrote:

Theneka wrote:Constitutions suck!

Nah
Nose nitpickers who want to do follow the constitution by the letter sucks

This is why constitution sucks^^

The constitution is so complicated for me.